Weblogg-Ed

Note: As of 8/9/02, Weblogg-Ed has moved to www.weblogg-ed.com. Please update your links!

"The survivors will not be defined by the lives they have led until now but by the lives that they will lead from now on." --Michael Berenbaum

"Blogs are the biggest mass writing experiment ever undertaken." --J. Lawless

New!Chat with me if I'm online! If the diamond's green, click it.

Are you a teacher using weblogs in the classroom? Please e-mail me!

Other Will Weblogs
Web Page Class
Journalism 1
Journalism 2
Journalism 1 Class Weblog
Journalism 2 Class Weblog
Media Literacy
Yearbook Blog (dead)
Nerdy Books
Student weblogs

E-mail
Featured Posts:
Weblogs as Research (journalism discussion)
Basic uses
Sarah's Ideas
Portfolio Idea (J)

Archives
11/01/2001 - 12/01/2001 12/01/2001 - 01/01/2002 01/01/2002 - 02/01/2002 02/01/2002 - 03/01/2002 03/01/2002 - 04/01/2002 04/01/2002 - 05/01/2002 05/01/2002 - 06/01/2002 06/01/2002 - 07/01/2002 07/01/2002 - 08/01/2002 08/01/2002 - 09/01/2002
Home

Comments by: YACCS

<< edublog list >>

Let Spyonit.com notify you when this page changes!

Run

OK... :: ...try this. posted by Will Richardson 10:42 AM Link	Wednesday, July 31, 2002
The End is Near... :: Thanks to some help from some new friends, I crossed a Manila threshold this morning. Here's where I'm at with my new Manila site, and I have to say, I am loving the potential. Some of the best parts...the easy "filing" of material in departments with easy call back from the nav bar (which took me a while to figure out, but I got it...), the easy use of pics, the interface, the website building ability. This is very cool. Please come and tell me what you think. I still have a questions post which you may have to scroll to get to. The end of my Blogger site is near... Pat is right about using Manila Newbies as a place to get questions answered, but it doesn't look like there's a lot of action on the boards. I didn't even really know how to ask for what I wanted until I "got" the whole macro concept this morning. Talk about an "a-ha" moment! Now don't get me wrong...I'm not saying Manila is a piece of cake. I'm praying that some of the stuff that I've done is template-able, if you know what I mean, so I can copy it for teachers without having them or me do all these configurations. But I do feel like I can start to speak the language a bit now...I'm pumped! More later... posted by Will Richardson 6:32 AM Link
Oops... :: Appears the site may only be accessible locally. I'll try again tomorrow. posted by Will Richardson 12:32 PM Link	Tuesday, July 30, 2002
Manila it is... :: Ok...I'm running Manila off our server and have started a personal site here. The first page is a list of questions that I'd love if anyone can help me with. Unfortunately, one of them deals with why there is no discuss link at the bottom of the post, so please post answers here. Thanks. posted by Will Richardson 10:29 AM Link
Weblogging Cornhuskers :: Thanks to Ken for pointing me to Brian Fitzgerald , who looks like he's got all of the Lincoln, NE schools on Manila. He's even created a couple of teacher/school themes to play with. And his district has some Manila tutorials (and here and here) and tips and tricks page. I'm going to try to find out the extent of weblog use in his district, but it looks like it might be another sample that we can use to show the potential. More and more, I think Manila is going to be my choice. Now that I'm seeing that things can be made a bit more intuitive, I feel like I'm getting more focused on the implementation part. Joe is going with p-machine, so maybe we can share our pilot stories. (Digital Cousins Part 2?) And now, after looking at Lincoln, I find my brain really going toward the whole km piece that Manila can do on a schoolwide basis. It is more than a weblogging tool...another reason to move this way, I think. Article on weblogs in education. Some interesting resources as yet untapped here, but not too much new. posted by Will Richardson 6:53 AM Link	Monday, July 29, 2002
Gone campin'... :: ...and in the chaos of five families and 15 kids eating burnt hot dogs and soggy graham crackers, I'll be thinking about my own Part 2 to Terry's Part 1: "If the choice to embrace a weblog was just my personal one, then I would not scruple so. But if I, as a teacher, make the choice for others, then I'd better damn well better know why it's a good choice." It's a point very beautifully said, and it reminds me of the many times I said to my teacher/students this week not to create lessons or projects to accomodate the technology, but to think about how the technology can improve what they already do. And that's the only reason to choose weblogs, because they enhance and improve what we and our students already do, the writing and thinking and communication and collaboration. And because they then give us a vehicle to improve other parts of our teaching, our communication with peers, with parents, with administrators, with professionals and mentors. And because they can build community. (Aren't we all witness to that?) Terry is right to nail down the "why weblogs?" question. It is the first step, and I'm looking forward to his answer. And then the other piece, the best tool. Seb says I may be on the verge of "finally blow[ing] my mind", and Joe is ready to arrange an intervention to a Bloganon meeting on my behalf. I know my search for a kinder, gentler, more classroom friendly system has some people shaking their heads. But I just think that someone can do it without too much effort, and I'm starting think that someone may be Seb. His experiment has already made a huge leap in Manila for me just in being able to edit the nav bar more easily. And now Pat and others (Hey Pat, don't you have a plane to catch???) are throwing out their dream tweaks, which if we keep doing it and Seb keeps working it and we find some way to make his time worthwhile may just lead to a Manila template that we can standardize for teachers and students and put an end to this nutty search I'm on. I just feel like if we can get it pretty much right today, we'll have a lot easier time "selling" it tomorrow. Not perfect...Pat is right when he says that we need a bunch of early adopters to push this thing and show us all what can be done. But the tool can evolve as those of us who are self-motivated enough push it, and those in that much larger pool of "please-teach-me-how-to-use-it-but-don't-expect-me-to-develop-it" types (and their students) reap the benefits of an easy, useful piece of software. At any rate, it'll be something to think about in the few quiet moments of my back to the woods weekend. posted by Will Richardson 10:11 AM Link	Friday, July 26, 2002
What's a boy to do? :: Ok. If I wasn't totally dazed and confused about all of this before, I'm over the edge today. This is my weblog life as I know it: I love Blogger, I've always loved Blogger, but I've outgrown it. I need more. Surveying the teacher-weblogging landscape, I see Manila seems to be the thrilla, but the more I get into it and after yesterday's difficulties, it seems more like a gorilla. (BTW, thank you to Terry and Seb for commiserating and David for the help.) P-machine, on the other hand, is clean and and pretty easy (and my tech guy says their tech support is, and I quote, "friggin awesome!"). I'm going to play more today. But then I get an e-mail from Karen this morning espousing Antville , and, oh my God! In literally seven minutes, I did this. What I'm loving is built-in commenting and separate comment pages (just like (sigh) MetaFilter!), picture uploads, e-z collaboration with defined permissions, sound and video upload, a pretty clean interface. Downside of course is the remote hosting, but you can download the software and make it work locally. (More fluids for my tech guy!) At the very least, it signals the absolute end of Blogger in my classroom. Glad I still got six weeks before school starts! Joe seems to have made his decision to go with p-machine. I need to roll up my sleeves and play some more with it. As Sebastian says "Manila is not an impressive show case of human centered design." He and David (in his comment here yesterday) suggest that Manila can be tweaked for ease of use, and if I am going to use it this fall, I'm going to need to think hard about what that basic template needs to look like. I know I want students/teachers to be able to post news items, stories, pictures and gems, that I want them to be able to receive comments, to work collaboratively, to set permissions, and to add links to the navigation bar. But what else? And what about the bugginess that I experienced yesterday? I'm going to dive into p-machine for a couple of hours today and put it through it's paces. If anyone wants to join me, just click on the chat button at left. posted by Will Richardson 7:00 AM Link	Thursday, July 25, 2002
Manila Gorilla :: Posting from class, Manila discussion finished, "students" playing. Basically, the coolest thing about it is the ability to build a Web site, have ongoing discussions, and maintain a weblog all in one place. The downside is that it's a bit erratic, at least from what we just experienced, and just not intuitive. Can anyone tell me why we would have to refresh every screen within the site to get it to note the changes we made? Why in some text boxes it suddenly changes html into gobbledeegook that shows up in the post? Why "edit this post" buttons appear in spots where we shouldn't be allowed to edit? Why some of the templates are missing "recent discussion" links? Why I can't delete news items? And more to come, I'm sure. The other impression I'm getting is that it's just a lot to remember to make changes to the config in terms of the way discussions are set up, or news items, or e-mail notifications etc. Should I add members or let them join? Do I set permissions beforehand or after? Is there anyway to set up a template where all of the appropriate configurations are already made so students/teachers don't have to go all that hassle?...Makes me tired, and stirs up all those original feelings I've had about it from the start, that it's harder than it looks to "get right" (yet, I know it can be done.) So I'm trying to play with p-machine which just seems more fluid and easier to make work at it's most basic level. I just want simple, I swear, 'cause even low levels of frustration will drive people away. posted by Will Richardson 10:42 AM Link	Wednesday, July 24, 2002
Some more teachers getting into the act... :: Some interesting discussions here... posted by Will Richardson 5:35 AM Link
Workshop Day 1 Complete :: Think I may be hitting the weblog wall, so to speak. Six hours of weblog info, theory and Blogger is a lot, and Manila on tap for tomorrow. I was interested to see what the reactions were going to be, and for the most part they were positive. The theory is easy to get to, and the sales pitch goes down pretty easy when discussing real life collaboration and content management. And as I've said before, a lot of the issues that plague others don't reside here. But there were some bumps with Blogger in terms of being able to figure out how to do the basics, some lost posts, some frustration. To be honest, I'm a little worried about Manila tomorrow since I'm not as at ease with it and it's a step up. (Anyone want to edit/test the Manila part of my outline to make sure I'm on the right track?) I know it's going to take me some time to be as fluent with it as Karen; just hoping to be able to help them set up the basics. I think I'll have some of those early adopters that Pat refers to here at this school this year. If nothing else, I'm going to get in front of 100 teachers and show them what they can do and get them thinking. We can support them pretty well, but I'm gonna have to get some training on Manila somewhere because much like Sebastian, I too am struggling with taking the software and customizing it for my needs. (How about the online Ken Dow course?) Too bad NWP won't step up and develop what we need...what exactly do we need anyway? posted by Will Richardson 12:20 PM Link	Tuesday, July 23, 2002
Posting from Class :: In the midst of my Weblogs in Education workshop and we're blogging away...pretty cool. If anyone wants to look at the course outline (and give me some feedback) I would really appreciate it. posted by Will Richardson 7:40 AM Link
Random Sightings :: Craig Jensen: "Even though the courses that I would have been teaching were related to bookbinding and book and library conservation, I felt that a weblog, maintained over the course of a graduate students educational career, would evolve into an invaluable component of their portfolio/resumé upon graduation." Survey: Using weblogs to teach Jim McGee: "If, however, you believe that an education should be preparing people to cope, and thrive, in the world after/outside school, then we'd better be talking about personal knowledge management strategies and learning how to learn." Hyperlit at Clarkson U. posted by Will Richardson 10:13 AM Link	Monday, July 22, 2002
Access :: I'm a little slow on the uptake, but I'm kinda figuring out that while access and hosting is pretty much a non issue at my school, it's a big issue with a lot of schools. And I'm wondering if there might not be a way that we could help take the lead in that area. I know we have tons of server space. (I have a 60G server dedicated just to my yearbook...and I know I could get a grant...) But before I go making promises I can't keep, I need some data on what hosting weblogs for other schools might entail. I ran about 50 weblogs last year through Blogger but all hosted locally, and my IT person says they used about 5 meg of space. Not too hard to do the math here to figure out that we could probably host a slew of these puppies, especially in the early stages. But it can't be that easy. If we used Manila, would schools have to buy the license at least? If we used p-machine? How many could we create? What are the issues with using pitas and blogger and schoolblogs that make them a less effective choice? (I think I know the answer here, but I'd be interested to hear from the rest...) What are the other concerns? Depending on what the answers are, maybe my school can "step up" as Peter suggests. Worth talking about at least. Terry is back (Yay!) and asking those same questions. But his description of most of his students as having at best intermittent Internet access at home goes to the other obvious problem here. Word I get in some parts is that some states are starting to develop online content for their students, which means that they have to have access. But what do you do with the kids that don't? Obviously, that's a tougher question. posted by Will Richardson 6:08 AM Link
Zen Moment :: I've been feeling need to take a step back and breathe, just sit for a moment and survey the landscape at it zooms by. Interesting, isn't it, how this community grows. Back in December, for me it was just Peter, Pat, Terry and Sarah. Now there's Joe who is been OD-ing on this, and Sebastian, Ken, Karen, David, Charlie Lowe at Fla. State, Barbara and the rest of Middlebury. And now Greg from Indiana U, and soon others. Seems like slowly but surely we're kinda finding each other and challenging each other in very stimulating ways (at least for me.) I also want to remember to feel the rush of all this intellectual challenge. For me, at least, this has brought me to a very cool place and forced me to do more writing and thinking about my teaching than I have in many years. Easy to get swept up by it. And I want to remember to bow to the gods of good fortune that have provided me the opportunity to go with it. From The Little Zen Companion: "It is good to have an end to journey toward; but it is the journey that matters, in the end." Ok, moment over...Greg feels that my idea yesterday might have a negative impact in the classroom in terms of asking them to "prove each other wrong by challenging either the information or the source" of their individual research. I may not have been clear in what my brain was thinking. (I do that a lot...get lost in the inspiration.) I'm not sure that "teacher-instigated, required conflict" is quite what I was aiming at. More, I'm thinking that students need to be shown the merits of not just accepting as truth the first thing they find. If part of the process was for collaborators to find other points of view, present them all to the group, and then collectively come to some conclusions as to what the "truth" may actually be, it would show them the benefits of looking at more than one side of the issue. Weblogs would be a great way to watch that process happen. In another post, Greg linked to some excellent sites on alternative assessments, which is a whole 'nother part of this discussion for me. (I need to start another weblog...yeah, right.) In an e-mail, he writes "I think what a blog might bring is the longitudinal record of the process for a student, and would allow them to become more reflective about where they were then and where they are heading now. It would also allow others to see that, too. Some instructors can see this as they might have a student in different classes thru the few years the student is at that school. But to get students to start looking at themselves and their own learning efforts would be a huge leap forward, imho." Certainly resonates here. And the assessment question has already come up regarding my proposal. Greg also writes "We all gotta help each other, at this point. And yes, once you enjoy the blog kool-aid, you start seeing all sorts of possible uses for them. :-)" Amen. Joe is struggling with access issues and ways to build the idea for weblogs: "I felt the need to pull my head out of the clouds today after conversations with several teachers here in NYC who don't even have access to a server for hosting any type of web-based materials for class - from a simple class website to a blog." Did I mention I feel lucky? But I need to remember that this place is not reality for a lot of other teachers out there. This is going to take some time, which is a good thing, I think. Finally, Chris responds to Pat's surprise when his workshop members loved the Blackboard demo. Basically, he says it'll pass: "And in the end what they really wanted was a writing, authoring, dissemination tool for themselves and their students. Something like a weblog. But they don't know that's what they want, because it's hard to describe, and you have to use it to know what it is, and it's totally unlike any of those other courseware apps out there that people have been oohing and aahing over for many years now, but somehow the oohing and aahing dies down after people use them." I'll keep this in mind as I formulate my pitch... posted by Will Richardson 7:33 AM Link	Friday, July 19, 2002
Online Research Literacy/Webog Idea :: This article in the Washington Post does a great job of capturing the changing nature of students doing research. (Via Tenreasonswhy.) A quote: "But they [students] also value information-gathering over deliberation, breadth over depth, and other people's arguments over their own. This has educators worried." We struggle with this mightily, and I am constantly thinking about the implications that weblogs could have on student research. The collaboration potential for research is what really interests me. How might kids be better served by doing joint research with reflection in a shared space where they could work out their ideas in the asynchronous, more thoughtful environment that Barbara alludes to? Certainly, collecting the information is important, but challenging the depth and reliability of that information is equally as important. We do a good job teaching the former, I think. We don't do so much with the latter, primarily because of the time element involved. Hypertext certainly facilitates a teacher's ability to check sources and the correctness of the information. But we don't have the time to really challenge those assumptions with additional research. How about this...a collaborative research weblog where students are required to try to prove each other wrong by challenging either the information or the source, then come to consensus as to where truth lies, then write the essay or story? (They could each write it based on their collaborative efforts.) A reading of the weblog would (hopefully) show students actively engaged in not only collection but reflection on what they collected. Again, probably not a new idea, but how much easier could it be for the teacher to interact and assess the process in weblog format? posted by Will Richardson 7:05 PM Link	Wednesday, July 17, 2002
From the "I love the Internet Dept."... :: 12:18:00 p.m.--See in log that site got referred from http://pourquoiapprendre.blogspot.com/ 12:18:15 p.m.--go there and find link and some discussion about my site...written in French! Damn! Want to see what it says. 12:18:43 p.m.--Put the following into Alta Vista's Translator: "Bien sûr je ne suis pas le premier à tenter de relier Webblog et éducation... Voici donc une petite communauté Blog.. qui sait si c'est intéressant, cette communauté pourra se retrouver dans la colonne de gauche...C'est écrit en anglais... Hum... Dois-je commencer à transcrire mes pensées en langue de "Shakkessspeare"... That's is the question (elle est facile, non ?... il est tard... moi je trouve que c'est pas mal pour la première journée !)" 12:18:45 p.m.--Read this: "Of course I am not the first to try to connect Webblog and education... Here thus a small Blog. community. which knows if it is interesting, this community will be able to find itself in the left-hand column... It is written in English... Hum... Must I start to transcribe my thoughts in language of "Shakkessspeare"... Is That' S is the question (it easy, not?... it is... me late I find that it is not badly for the first day!) So what did we do before Al Gore invented the Internet??? posted by Will Richardson 9:19 AM Link
Thank goodness for the tweakers... :: Pat and Sebastian are rolling up their sleeves to develop a kinder, gentler Manila. Sebastian says "Much can be done already. And if we pool our ideas and skills together we might be able to get some pressing issues resolved. I have already started to construct a list of Manila weaknesses and issues that really bug me in my design efforts. I think it is important to document and reflect on the reasons why these missing features are important. Then we could try to figure out what it takes to improve our design environment... " Not to revisit the whole discussion, but I guess this is what I was hoping we could do in terms of making it as teacher-friendly and relevant as possible. Manila wasn't developed for teachers. Pat and Sebastian and others (all with much more programming knowledge and skill than I) are trying to push it for classroom benefit. Certainly, the opportunities for this seem to be even greater with open source (btw, still looking forward for Joe's p-machine experiment...). Either way, I'm just really glad they are doing the work they're doing 'cause I know I couldn't do it. Whatever I can do to test and give feedback and ideas, I will. On an unrelated topic, I've just been struck in the past couple of days by some weblog as healing type articles. The first, from Wired about Alzheimer's patients keeping weblogs as a way to slow down the disease (with this uplifting quote: "But a lifelong regimen of cognitive exercise, including journaling, may help delay AD's onset by up to 10 years -- long enough for many individuals to outlive it."), and another from Glenn Fleischmann who wants to set up free blogging space for those with serious illnesses and their families. What cool ideas. posted by Will Richardson 8:54 AM Link
News Flashes... :: #1--Will buys Manila! (Where do I get my membership card?) #2--School Gets Will's Pitch; Pilot Weblog Program in the Offing! Here's the plan: This fall, I'm going to "recruit" 10 freshmen to take part in a Weblog Portfolio independent study which with any luck will start them on the road to a four-year exit portfolio of their best work and a companion reflective learning journal all in the form of a personal weblog. Included in the process will be two student mentors, a teacher mentor, a parent, a community member, and an outside "professional" relevant to the student's main interests. Tentatively, students will receive two credits per year (and next year, if all goes well, the independent study will turn into an actual course), and will recieve two additional credits when they present their portfolios to a yet to be determine panel at the end of their senior years. (Joe, do you think a phone call is imminent???) I AM VERY PSYCHED! But there are many questions and logistical issues to sort out, which I need to do in the next few weeks. Help! Much, much more on this later... #3--Will Gets Readers! Now look, I'm not one to put a lot of stock in log numbers, but supposedly this site got 84 looks yesterday from unique visitors (not earth shattering, I know, but still makes me think even harder about what I write...a good thing.) Now I only know of about 10-15 other teachers who are doing this stuff, so if you're reading this and you're thinking about using weblogs in your classroom, for godness sakes, speak up! Make yourself known! Join the community. These people are pretty cool and smart and energetic and some pretty exciting stuff is afoot. The more people we have in the conversation, the better! posted by Will Richardson 7:03 AM Link	Tuesday, July 16, 2002
Is it me... :: ...or is there all of a sudden a lot of stuff happening around here??? Pat obviously has too much time on his hands, which is a good thing for all of us. Just think of the applications for this. Joe is fooling around with Manila and p-machine and God knows what else. (And rumor has it there's a new addition...) Sebastian is creating a weblog yearbook for goodness sakes. And Sarah (where's your picture???) is back from England where she's been doing some great work (this is worth the read) in spreading the word. Meanwhile I'm changing stinky diapers and fixing the roof. If I'd known I was going to be consumed by weblogs to this extent I probably would have forgone the wife the kids and the house and just thrown a cot in my office at school! (I'm reminded of Barbara Ganley when in reflecting on her class she says "wildly effective at stimulating and fueling discussions, the weblogs often seemed to be taking over our lives." Amen.) I've come to the conclusion that for my own sanity, I need to remain focused on the classroom applications here, and leave the technology to someone else. There are so many good places to start, already, that I'm going to focus on the sales pitch and the construction more than the vehicle. I'm jealous that I can't do what some of you are doing in terms of Manila and open source and php etc. (I want to do it all.) I'll be more than happy to give feedback on your efforts. I'm more drawn to what Karen McComas is doing with her computer literacy class which is just amazing, and if you haven't spent some time sifting through the layers of the site, you should. She's obviously one of the most organized people on the planet, and she's obviously thought out the design of the site to the smallest detail. I love how she gives each assignment a separate page for students to respond to. I like her own personal journal of the class as well. Great stuff. And I'm wondering how she uses Yahoo Groups to archive the class e-mails. It's a nice blend of technologies. As I think about what I want to do this fall in my own classes, I see some great potentials, obviously. But I also keep bumping up against some nagging issues that are more K-12 specific that I thought I'd throw out to the group for some feedback. These are issues that I know I'm going to have to address at some point with my teachers and parents and administrators, so... Access: I'm fortunate to teach writing and journalism in a computer lab, and I teach in an area of the country where most families have computers and Internet at home, so this isn't a big issue. But my lit classes are not taught in a lab. And I do have some kids without access at home (even though they have access to the Internet from the library, other classrooms, etc). And I'm sure this is a bigger issue in many other schools, though I don't know how much. Is it fair to expect kids without access at home to do as much as kids that have it? What are some other access issues that might affect the way we use weblogs in our classrooms? Privacy: With Manila, there is a way to restrict weblogs to Intranet viewing only, which would assuage any concerns of privacy that my administrators might have. But that would preclude collaboration from outside, which is one of the most appealing features of this. Assessment: I'd be interested in a discussion of assessment related issues with weblog use. Writing itself can be assessed in traditional ways, but do we assess participation and discussion? How? Time: I teach in a nine week term, 84 minutes a day. Obviously, weblogs add a time element for reading and responding and updating that many teachers might find overwhelming. How do we manage the time aspect of this most effectively? **Server issues Karen worried in one post that her students work on antville.com may have been lost. How can we make sure our work and our students' work doesn't evaporate into cyberspace. I'm sure there are more... posted by Will Richardson 6:40 AM Link	Monday, July 15, 2002
Hey...how'd he do that? :: Sebastian's new page is really well done from a design standpoint.And now we can all thank him for putting faces with names! (That was a shock, Sebastian, until I realized it probably wasn't THAT hard to find that picture...) posted by Will Richardson 4:22 AM Link	Saturday, July 13, 2002
Student Publishing with Weblogs :: Joe asks "Does the public nature of a weblog inhibit the types of things that students will publish there?" As a writing/journalism teacher for 18 years, there's no doubt in my mind that publication changes the way students think and write. When kids know they have an audience, they write with more care and depth. But that audience has always been constructed, and with rare exception, authors never find out how readers react to their stories or to their thoughts in writing except in artificial, teacher directed ways. Sure, I've used small group feedback exercises, and I've had students read to the class. But this pre-publication "audience" is not the way true audiences work. Once you publish something, you can't take it back and revise it for meaning or correctness. For instance, I have no idea who will read this (maybe no one). But the fact that someone might dramatically changes the way I write. And yes, it does inhibit me in some way. Even in other more personal weblogs that I have created, the chance that someone, somewhere will read what I write inhibits me from dumping my true feelings as I do in my paper journals which are hidden away in secret places. But those inhibitions are not a bad thing from a teaching standpoint. Getting students to understand that their thoughts or opinions, while emotionally held, must be organized and readable and defensable can only be helped by giving them a potentially huge and anonymous Internet audience. One change that I would like to effect in my students' weblogs this year is to get them an even wider audience, to have them collaborate with professionals or classes from other schools or community members. I can guarantee you that if I put a letter in the local paper looking for mentors to help kids with their writing by interacting online in their weblogs, I would get a flood of responses. How about getting parents involved in the process, too? They can become more active participants in the learning of their kids, and that might be the most important potential here of all...I know as a parent, I would love to be able to take a look at what my child is learning and thinking by accessing his/her weblog. And to be able to contribute to that thinking and learning in some way would be even better. What a cool concept... posted by Will Richardson 8:47 AM Link	Friday, July 12, 2002
Chatting with Pat :: During a BlogChat last night, Pat made a nice analogy of the difference between Web pages and weblogs. He's alluded to it before, but last night he made it clearer, and it makes sense. Pat sees creating Web pages as "paper making" whereas weblogs are "writing on paper". It's a great point. When I think about how I typically would use paper in the classroom, it's very similar to the way I want to use weblogs...to go paperless. "Websites have to be as easily available as paper," Pat says, and the way that's coming to fruition is the weblog. But think of that...what a great pitch that is to get classroom teachers interested in this! The biggest obstacle to taking teaching online has always been the creation and publication of content. I've taught scores of teachers how to use the Internet. I've taught hundreds of kids dozens of teachers how to make web sites. Yet, only three or four teachers in our faculty of 250 have a web presence. And it's all because it's hard to do (unless you are loving the technology like I do). But now... Your students can publish online for all of your class to read and respond to, and those responses take place with the writing itself. (No more copying of essays and poems and whatever.) Your students can create Web sites that chronicle not only their work but their thinking. You can watch groups of your students collaborate, debate, and create. You can see your students work from classes before yours. Your class can have an online space where you can manage work and point to relevant information for deeper study. And best of all...you don't need to learn Front Page, HTML, FTP, IP, or any other of those scary acronyms that keep people from using the Internet! And let's face it, we're all in sales. Whether it's course content to our kids or teaching methodology to our peers, the whole idea is to sell them the idea that what we are imparting will make their lives richer, easier, more meaningful, more fun, etc. So I've been thinking a lot about that, about how to "sell" this concept to my teachers. And it always comes down to "it's E-Z!" You don't have to be a techie to do this. You can even teach your students to do this. It can even be fun. But Pat also got me thinking about the teacher weblog carcasses that I'm already finding. (Since schoolblogs is obviously the biggest provider of space to teachers, I'd love to know how many of their weblogs are consistently updated, or for how long the weblogs are being used.) I can't count the number of teacher weblogs I've seen that are nothing more than the "It Worked!" page in Manila...Maybe their the bottom third on the tech access ladder that Ken referred to earlier. I'm going to keep my focus, however, on the possibilities. Just a few minutes ago I pitched this idea to my assistant superintendent: A pilot independent study for 10 freshmen next year to build, over the course of their high school careers, a weblog/portfolio that would serve not only as a publication vehicle for their best work, but a learning journal along the way. Picture this: each of the students gets 2 credits per year (equiv to about 1.5 hours of work per week). The space is collaborative in that each student has a teacher mentor, another student, a parent, a community member, and a professional mentor to view and give feedback and advice as the portfolio and journal grow. At the end of senior year, we throw a big party and present the portfolios as records of learning. The details are still a little fuzzy, but I can't imagine what something like that might do to give relevance to the idea of school as learning not just taking classes. And guess what...it would be EZ for everyone...in fact, after just one day with Manila, I know it would work. And think about teacher development. We have a waiver at our school from traditional evaluation for tenured teachers. They have the option of peer coaching or portfolios. Either way, think of what weblogs could do for small groups of teachers collaborating, or departments, or...I just can't stop seeing the ways this could change what we do. Also, reading Rebecca Blood's Weblog Handbook, and finding some really interesting observations. (If you haven't checked out her weblog, you should.) The implications for classroom use really aren't covered, but the aspects of hypertext and content that she brings up certainly apply to what we're doing. Here's a taste: "Webloggers invite participation in another way--they produce webloggers. Reading the thoughts of others like themselves, ordinary individuals suddenly understand that on the Web anyone can speak their piece, and readers become writers." And, as alluded to by Pat: "The Web enables continual publishing, in which updates can occur at any time; it is this aspect of the Web that weblogs can capitalize on." Not earth-shattering, but well put. As I read, however, I am struck by how different what we're thinking and talking about doing feels from the traditional form. posted by Will Richardson 5:52 AM Link	Thursday, July 11, 2002
Giving it a shot... :: ...but not having much success, I'm afraid at least at 9:47 a.m. ET. I know I've said this before, but it just doesn't seem to be as inutitive as other software. I'll keep plugging, however, for the greater good... posted by Will Richardson 6:48 AM Link	Wednesday, July 10, 2002
Taking the Manila Plunge :: Pat and Ken are offering some great support for a tentative plunge into Manila. Now that I actually was able to post to Pat's "newspaper" (way too cool), I'm thinking all sorts of creative things to do. And Ken has graciously offered some server space for my workshop people to test out Manilla. I was planning just a Blogger run through since I thought that's what they would probably be using. But the decision here is pretty much up to me, and now I'm thinking that I could have Manila up an running before school starts without too much trouble. I'm going to have a chat with my sys admin later today I think. A list of Manila questions will most likely follow. posted by Will Richardson 9:49 AM Link	Tuesday, July 09, 2002
Much to Think About... :: First, let me just say how cool it is that we're cranking up this whole discussion. Just for kicks, here's an attempt to respond to Pat and Peter and Sarah and Joe and the excellent discussion happening at KairosNews (definitely worth a read) all in one long post. There's so much being said that any attempts at assimilating them into one place will probably fail, but here goes. I'm still going to suggest that we can do better than what we have, and that the time to do better is now. I absolutely dread the idea of teaching teachers one way and then having to teach them something else. I guess I have this fear that once we start down a path, it's going to be hard to turn back. Seems that's the way it happens here and elsewhere. So I'm putting pressure on myself to MAKE THE BEST CHOICE, and I just wish I had one of my own making. Pat and Peter and Sara are all Manila-ites...maybe they know best. (By the way, I'm hoping to make a pilgrimage to Middlebury in a few weeks to take a first hand look at all the great stuff they're doing.) And Pat is really putting it through its paces. But Blogger is SO easy...for teachers and students. The considerations here are many: ease of use for teachers, server space and support, programming languages, reliability, volume, personalization, etc. Pat says "The issue isn't the blogWare! The issue is affordable, reliable, updatable hosting!" I wish I could see make it that easy for myself. Ken Tompkins at Richard Stockton College suggests portal software like p-machine to use with weblogging software like Manila for students. (Check out his PostNuke-created literature portal during daytime hours here). And then there is the issue of what teachers will adopt...Again, Pat says "It really isn't that hard to put up a page and start fiddling around with it for your own writing and teaching. Sure, to go beyond that stage, you need imagination, time, infrastructure and support. But those requirements have nothing to do with the tool." And Peter's experience is that "All teachers can do the weblog basics of writing, posting pictures and updating. This is the 'minimal amount of the environment' that the majority require at the moment. Some have progressed to using the discussion feature because it serves a particular project need that they have. Some are firing on all the 'tweaked' cylinders. Any progress or success however, has been due to the 'minimal' entry point which assured success and confidence." I'm starting to be swayed by their arguments and examples, although I still have a healthy dose of skepticism when it comes to teachers wanting to fiddle and play around. I hope Ken is right when he says "Our faculty used to be divided into three groups: (1) the group that would adopt/use any technology put before them, (2) the group that had to be convinced to adopt/use technology and (3) the group that wouldn't use technology if god commanded it. I used to spend enormous time on group 3 -- coaxing, demanding, tricking them into using technologies. Then I had a conversation with the VP of Academic Computing at Princeton. He urged me to ignore them on the grounds that they consumed too much time and would be replaced with group 1 & 2 members eventually." I think Joe asks a good question when he writes "Is this simply the stage we happen to be in where this type of work is just too cutting edge or experimental for most educators?" I am still amazed at how few teachers know about it and use it. And then there is the way we present the tool...Ken says: " I see portals as part of the blog experience (I understand that they are not really blogs) in that they introduce the student to the idea that organizing information for easy access is important, that ideas on content are everywhere and that a blog works best when it links their lives to the wider community, that current information is important, that it is a worthwhile work to find, summarize, filter, etc. information on the web so that it can be made available to others, say, on a blog." I really like the way he puts that. My workshop is on in two weeks. This is great thinking and writing about how to best approach it. Thanks. posted by Will Richardson 9:05 AM Link	Monday, July 08, 2002
I Hate Pat... :: ...I really do. If he keeps this up, I'm going to have to get serious about Manila. Yes, Pat, I'm impressed. Now, how about I tell you what I want and you build it for me??? Answer me this...just html, right? Can the different departments have different editors and permissions? Images work in each dept? Can you archive stuff in each dept?I'm assuming the reason I couldn't post a response is because I needed to register to the site, right? Also assuming the discussion page shows all comments in order? (This is still one issue with Manila that seems to give me fits...the discussion piece.) Thanks, Pat...seriously. I have much more to ask and to share tomorrow since road fatigue has officially set in. posted by Will Richardson 6:06 PM Link	Sunday, July 07, 2002
Frustrating! :: Been reading such good stuff from Pat and Peter and Joe, and I have much to say, but visiting at Lake Lanier in Ga. for a week has some pretty tempting diversions. Back in NJ tomorrow night I hope and then ready for a long post on Monday. Thanks for all of your efforts! posted by Will Richardson 8:48 AM Link	Saturday, July 06, 2002
Good Questions/My Rant :: Sarah says: I have to say that I agree with Pat D.'s comments on the subject: "...Manila had to be "tweaked" to do all the things I had it doing. Hmm - that's right. But then again, everything I do in a classroom has to be "tweaked." "Everyone's going to want to use the tool in a different way, according to their pedagogical goals, etc. People are always going to pick and choose amongst the feature set that a tool offers. Does the perfect tool exist, and is it worth spending the programming time and dollars to build your own?" True. I guess I'm seeing an opportunity for those of us who are not completely satisfied with what we use to help create something that's 95% effective instead of 80%. There will always be room for tweaking for the hard-core users among us. Not going to happen with the other 28 people in my department or 225 or so teachers at my school. It's different from tweaking the way you teach a class, which every good teacher has the skills to do. Very few good teachers have the skills to take a technology like weblogs and tweak it for their own purposes the way Pat and Sarah and Peter and I and the others have. So I have to say yes, it is worth the programming time and dollars to do it, because I really believe the technology won't be adopted by many good teachers who could use it well unless we do so. Chris, who is gladly back writing, I think echoes these thoughts when he says: "My caution was that what Patrick was showing to the group gathered that evening within and among the many sites he is using is pushing what is mostly promised but not fully realized interoperable technology, and requires at this point a fair amount of manual tweaking, which is the result of a lot of skill, knowledge, and touch acquired over maybe a year and a half. While that's fine for advanced users, it's not going to be fine for these other groups new to this technology, especially if one expects to see results out of real work within a few months, and even more especially if there isn't better than adequate suport for the user, which means not only technical support but also support and advice for on-line communities about logistics, process, and appropriate applications." (See full post for context.) And Sebastian weighs in (at least I've got people talking about it...) "What is missing are the "translators" the folks that understand enough of the technology and its limits AND education." (Again, see full post for context.) He's right, but what we have to do is bring those people together. Here's one idea: maybe we should contact Pyra, and p-machine, and other developers, give them our criteria/wish list and see what they say. Certainly, the entrepreneurs out there wouldn't be blind to a huge potential market, and I don't think we're asking for all that much more than any one of these softwares already offer. It's crucial that we put our brains together and develop the criteria, which is the discussion I'm trying to start. Look, Blogger didn't cost me any money. It didn't take any time to set up. I can teach it to my colleagues in minutes. It needs little support. It tweaks using html, which at its most basic level is pretty easy to learn. It runs on a regular old NT server or similar. Yes, it needs a commenting feature. It needs some column creation capability. It needs a few more things. But I have to tell you that when I think about buying Manila licenses and a Frontier server, or getting php and mySQL, or whatever else I need for those other platforms, I start losing interest. We're not normal here, gang! (Someone argue with me, please!) Let's start counting how many hours we've taken to learn and read and tweak and build. Then take maybe 1% of that number and you'll come close to the reality of what a normal classroom teacher will spend on it. Maybe I'm wrong, I dunno...I just think now is the time to do it, while there are still a lot of people out there willing to have a go at it because they realize the market potential. Call me crazy. Joe Luft is a classroom teacher from The Brooklyn International School who has taken the weblog dive. (You only have a very short time to come to your senses, Joe.) He says: "To make weblogs really work as a widely used educational tool and to really revolutionize classroom use of the web, we need a tool that makes it as painless as possible." I just don't think we've found it yet. posted by Will Richardson 3:42 PM Link	Wednesday, July 03, 2002

Links
Weblog Resources:
Weblogs Compendium*
Weblogs for Educators
Chris Lehmann
pMachine
Antville
UpSaid
History of Weblogs
Pitas (Blog Host)
Weblog Power
Pitas (Blog Host)
Moveable Type(Blog Host)
Weblogs as News
GreyMatter (Blog Host)
Weblogger(Blog Host)
Xanga(Blog Host)
Onclave
Weblog Articles
Swiss Army Website
Weblog Awards
Weblog Madness
Bloggar
Tinderbox
Targeted Serendipity

Weblogs I Read:
k-12 blogWrite
Pat Delaney
Sarah Lohnes
Joe Luft
Sebastian Fiedler
Seb's SOL Project
Terry ElLiot
David Walker
Educare
Greg Hanek
Ray Schroeder
Brian Fitzgerald
Chris Ashley
Stephen Downes
Lloyd Nebres
Schoolblogs.com
Peter Ford
SITech.
Rebecca's Pocket
Media Minded
Corante
Josh Marshall
Keep Trying
J.D. Lasica
Poynter Media Blog
News Trolls
Microcontent
Mark Bernstein
Kairosnews
Jay Cross

Weblogs in Schools/Best Practices:
Delano High School
Karen McComas
Barbara Ganley
Student Weblogs
Lincoln Pub. Schools
Beacon School
Dreamcatcher
Brit. Sch. of Amst.
Adv. Int. Class.
Coop. Reading Proj.
Kern County
Lloyd Nebres
SFEd Access
Centenary (La.)
I-Search (Pat)
Richard Stockton C
Emerson College
U. of Iowa
New School
Redwood City Library
Teachers LiveJournal
Internet Journalism
Esperero Canyon
EP
Dan Mitchell

Weblogs/Journalism:
Disaster Weblogs
Dan Bricklin
Weblogs & News
Blogging as J
Cyberjournalist
Media Weblogs
Glenn Fleischman
E&P Weblog Bandwagon
Journal. Pivot Points
Medill Sch. of J.
Weblogs & News

Weblogs/Teaching:
Online Discussions
Online Classroom
Weblogs as Community

Weblogs/Literature:
Dreamcatcher

Manila Related:
My Caxton Manila
Pat's Newspaper
Themes
Manila Home
Pat on Discussions
U. of S. Aust.
Hector's Tutorial
Bryan Bell
Ken Dow
RSC Space
Kern
Lincoln Tutorials

©2001/2 Will Richardson